The Neglect Of The Swim Discipline

It’s time to get on my soapbox again. Apologies in advance.

Too many triathletes are neglecting the swim discipline in their training. If I’m honest, sometimes their coaches are to blame. It has become almost commonplace when I work with a new athlete, or run a swim clinic for triathletes. Poor form with no remediation plan in place and a training regimen that is solely aerobic-based training.

I’ve been through 2 NGB (National Governing Body) coaching clinic weekends and had very high expectations going into both of those certification clinics. Yet, I remember texting my wife from both of those clinics stating how disappointing the instruction during the swimming portions were. To that point:

  • No discussion of energy systems as they relate to swim programming.

  • No discussion on how to write workouts to address specific energy systems.

  • No discussion on how to determine deficiencies in energy systems and remediate them.

  • Only a high level discussion on proper form, but no mention of how to resolve technical flaws.

I do a lot of work with US Masters Swimming and present at coaching clinics around the country. There are always triathlon coaches in attendance, and at least one of these coaches will approach me at a break and tell me that the discussion on writing workouts and energy systems was enlightening - that they “get it” now - and that they now have a much better understanding of writing workouts and how energy systems come into play.

The troubling part is that they didn’t “get it” before. I am fortunate that I come from a swimming background and could write swimming workouts and understood stroke remediation. The transition to being a multi-sport coach was easier for me in that regard.

If you’re a triathlon coach, you need to be versed in coaching all three disciplines. Every discipline is important, and it’s your responsibility to understand how to apply programming across all of them. The onus is on the coach t0 know how to work the aerobic, anaerobic, and VO2 systems appropriately.

That is your duty to your athletes.

This is your responsibility to the sport.

Just as we do with our athletes, we as coaches need to understand our limiters and remediate them. If we’re lacking in a specific area, it’s our responsibility to educate ourselves.

Equally as important we need to ensure that, during the coaching certification process, the swimming discussion covers energy systems, writing workouts, and how work-rest ratios come into play for proper programming. And of course mechanics and form needs to be covered, along with how to resolve deficiencies in biomechanics and basic form . If we don’t train our new coaches on how to program training for every discipline then we are doing a disservice to the coaching community and the athletes that they will serve.

Our up and coming coaching community shouldn’t stand for it.

As an athlete, if your coach doesn’t provide programming, or gather / ask for video of your swim stroke, and work on mechanics to ensure efficiency, you need to ask why they aren’t.

As a coach, or up and coming coach, If you leave a coaching clinic and aren’t able to describe how to write an aerobic, anaerobic, or VO2 session in the pool, then you should question the education that you have received.

On Writing Workouts

During all of my various coaching certification clinics the discussion around the creation of workouts was covered in detail. The main points of interest?

  • Specificity
  • Energy systems
  • Athlete understanding of goals of workout

Of course the importance of a good warm up, cool down, and dynamic stretching, was covered as well.

Let me clarify: Did we cover 'everything' in granular detail? No. You can't cover everything in a weekend-long clinic. You need to continue your education beyond the initial course. But, all that said, the three points above have been resonating with me lately. Why?

I'm seeing too many triathlon coaches prescribe workouts that have no specifics around energy systems, and no way for the athlete to know what the goal of the workout is. In some cases guaranteeing that the athlete do nothing but train their body to run long and slow on race day. A couple of examples that I've seen (posted online) lately:

Read more

My Doc Hollywood Moment

I call it my Doc Hollywood moment. If you're not familiar with the movie (it is from 1991, after all) the short synopsis is this: Med student in NY has plans to be a plastic surgeon in Hollywood. Sports cars, expensive home, etc. Encounters an unplanned detour, during the drive across country, where he falls for a simpler life in a small town. Yeah, he falls for a girl too, but you get the picture.

He realized he was happier with less - and didn't need all the material things as he thought he did.

Cut to: Back in the summer of 2011, my wife JL and I were having a somewhat existential conversation about our future. What did we want to be doing when we were 75 years old? We weren't retiring when we were 62, to be sure. Did I want to be locked in a beige office, working for some dusty old guy in a corner office until then? Or did I want to be doing something I enjoyed? Something that was satisfying for me, as well as doing good and right by other people? JL was doing just that; making changes to her career and starting her own consulting business.

Read more

Becoming a Coach

Is it really Ironman vs USAT ?

I received an email from an athlete / coach that I know. They're USAT Level 1 certified, and they're currently going through the Ironman University offering. The individual in question was quite emphatic about how USAT failed them in their coach certification, and how the Ironman program was superior. 

As our email chain went back and forth, I was told that the Ironman program was more in-depth. That the USAT program only allowed them to learn small portions of periodization. That there aren't enough people racing ITU for USAT to spend time focusing on it. Stating that the testing process for USAT certification was lacking.

Now, I'm not saying that USA Triathlon, or any other national governing body, is better than another in regards to coach certification and education. I'm also not saying that any one singular coaching clinic, once attended and the test passed, makes you a good coach.

That's right. Just going to a clinic, and passing the test, doesn't make you a good coach. It's what you do with that information moving forward that matters. It's how you continue your education that makes a difference. It's seeking out information and working with other coaches with more experience to help you grow professionally.

I'm a coach instructor for US Masters Swimming. I've had USAT level 1 coaches come up after a clinic and state how the session on writing workouts for differing energy systems was really helpful - that it wasn't covered enough in their Level 1 coaching clinic. That might be true, but the truth is you can't cover everything in granular detail in any one coaching clinic. I've had another individual tell me that the Masters coaching clinic was too easy and didn't cover everything in enough detail. Again, what are you doing with the information you learned? Are you taking the details of writing a workout for the anaerobic system and applying it to your athletes? Are you expanding upon the base premise of how those workouts are created, and making your own? Or better yet, are you taking that base level of information and seeking out more data to help you grow your knowledge base?

I've been a professional coach for 6 years. Do I know everything I need to know because I'm USA Triathlon, USA Cycling, USA Swimming / ASCA, and US Masters certified? Not even close. I am constantly learning. It never stops. Heck, most NGB's require that you continue to learn, and enhance your coaching education, to maintain your certification.

It's not all about what you learn in a clinic. It's what you do with the information that you learn.