Stroke Rate, Distance Per Stroke, and Why You're Probably Doing It Wrong

I've heard many a coach tell their athletes that targeting a low stroke rate in their swim is one of the benchmarks of improvement and efficiency. Yes, a swim stroke with a low stroke rate looks smooth and efficient, but you can't talk about stroke rate without looking at pace, and distance per stroke as well. Why do we need to look at all of these metrics?

A low stroke rate is usually indicative of a long glide phase in the front-quadrant of the stroke.  Having a low stroke rate and a long glide phase isn't always beneficial, especially in the sport of triathlon, when you're in the open water.

Before I continue further, let's define - simply - distance per stroke, and stroke rate:
  • Distance Per Stroke:  How far you go, or have gone, every time your hand enters the water.
  • Stroke Rate:  How fast you turn your arms over and have a hand enter the water.
So, this isn't to say that having a front-quadrant focused swim means you're going to be slow. You can be a very fast swimmer with a lower stroke rate and a front quadrant based stroke.  You'll just have shoulders as wide as Sun Yang - and you'll have to carry that extra muscle weight on the bike, and more importantly, on the run.  (As an aside, it's worth the time to watch the 1,500 meter finals from the 2012 Olympics if you didn't see it live.  It's an amazing swim, and you'll see what I mean by front-quadrant, glide phase, and wide shoulders.)

I recently participated in a course for USA Swimming coaches, and there was a section where coach Jonty Skinner discussed distance per stroke and stroke rate (which moving forward I'll refer to as DPS, and SR).  Mr. Skinner is a wealth of information, and he really summed up how you need to look at the relationship between DPS and SR. So how can we look at these two factors in an easy to understand context?
  • In regards to SR:  A .03 second increase, per stroke cycle, over 50 meters and you can potentially see up to a .4 second improvement.  Over 200 meters this could yield up to 1.5 seconds depending on your number of strokes.
  • In regards to DPS:  A 1 inch improvement (one more inch in your DPS) and you can expect almost the same relative impact.   That is to say, potentially, up to a .4 second gain per 50 meters or up to 1.5 seconds over 200 meters depending on how many strokes you're taking.
Another way to look at DPS and SR:  A really fast SR - where the swimmer is just thrashing their way though the water - almost always yields a minimal DPS.  And, a really slow SR almost always yields a slow swim.

There's a huge potential of time savings waiting to be tapped here.  And on paper this looks to be a very simple, and easy, improvement to make.  But these changes don't come easily.  Muscle memory, cardio load, form and mechanics - they all come into play here.

To that point, I am fortunate to be friends with an athlete here in Colorado Springs who, now retired, was a pro triathlete and a resident at the Olympic Training Center as a member of the national team.  He and I were chatting the other day and this topic came up (in a round-about way) as he was telling me about his arrival at the OTC and his jump to being a professional triathlete.  He was a great swimmer in high school, and was leading most sets in the pool, and was easily one of the fastest swimmers at the OTC. However, he'd get to an ITU triathlon event and he would be in the back-half of the swimmers coming out of the water.  He became so frustrated - and didn't understand how he could be swimming so poorly - that he was soon seeing the team Psychologist thinking it was a mental block.



What was going on?  He had a long glide phase, and in the open water the early part of his stroke was caught up in air bubbles and cavitation in the water from the swimmers ahead of him.  By shortening the glide phase of his stroke, and increasing his stroke rate, he was catching water - the anchor phase the stroke - much quicker, and his open water swim improved.  This didn't happen overnight.  It took time, and a lot of work.

A great example of a high stroke rate being a key factor in open water triathlon swimming success is Sara Haskins.  She has one of the highest SR's around in regards to pro women triathletes.  She might not be the fastest in a pool, but she's dangerous, and very quick, in the open water.

So how does one look at, and measure stroke rates, with an athlete?  The easiest way is to time it.  Time 10 stroke cycles, starting the stopwatch on the first right arm entry.  Count 10 strokes and stop timing.  Do that for every lap in a longer set.  Now you have your baseline stroke rate for your athlete, and you can take that information and measure it for comparison over time to gauge improvements. Additionally, so long as the data is readily available, you can also measure that data against other athletes.

Looking at distance per stroke isn't difficult either, but it takes a bit more time.  Video of your athlete swimming is the best way to gather this data.  Using your favorite video tool, Silicon Coach for example, you can mark the hand entry point of the left or right hand on the screen.  Then, as the video progresses, you can mark the next entry point of that same hand.  By using the measuring tool in your software to identify the width of each float on the lane line, you can then measure and determine the distance traveled during each full stroke cycle.  

How does this equate with the targeted swimming goals and individual metrics of your athlete?  You can look at it as simply as targeting a 50 meter swim at “X” stroke rate with “Y” distance per stroke.  Working on technique and efficiency is critical to improvements here.  Over time, by working on form and mechanics, a similar stroke rate can then yield a larger distance per stroke.  Then, by working on turnover, mechanics, and reducing the glide phase, you can increase stroke rate - thus finding improvements all around.

I'll be presenting a webinar on this topic on Thursday the 30th of January.  Announcements, and links to sign up for the webinar, will be coming soon from Vanguard Endurance.  This webinar will carry USA Triathlon CEU credit for all you coaches out there.  I'll be covering, in-depth, topics on stroke rate, distance per stroke, and the importance of form and stroke mechanics.

By the way - here's a link to the Mens 1,500 meter final from the 2012 Olympics.  You'll have to click the link to watch it on YouTube (content from the IOC and all) Enjoy!

Workout Wednesday - Christmas Day Special

It's Christmas, and there's no way you could have gotten out and swam this morning.  And if you somehow did find a pool that was open, you should go home now and spend time with your friends and family!  But, like a lot of athletes I know, you're itching for a workout and can't wait for the aquatics center to open up on the 26th.  So, what to do?


As I'm working on a blog post covering pre-season training, and the need to focus on speed endurance and speed, I thought I would whip up a simple set to focus on this.  First, a refresher on two of your energy systems:

Anaerobic Glycolysis Energy System.
  • Uses glycogen to generate energy.  glycogen is a carbohydrate that is stored in your muscular system.  It's broken down when energy demands are high.
  • This pathway provides energy for high intensity activities lasting from 10 seconds to 2 minutes.
Aerobic Energy System
  • Uses oxygen in the process of generating energy.
  • Used when activity lasts longer than about 2 minutes.  It’s also used for activities shorter than one minute, but the contribution is very small.
Energy production can be held for a long period of time in the aerobic system.  But the intensity of work must be reduced.

So, to work the anaerobic/aerobic system, you need to build a main set that is between 600-2000 yards or meters in distance, lasting approximately 8-40 minutes.  You'll prescribe between :15 and :50 rest between each effort.

Good examples of a anaerobic/aerobic system based set are:

6 x 200 on :30 rest.
or 
10 x 100 IM on :45 rest.  

Of course a better way to structure this workout is to determine a firm sendoff.  If you know your athletes base 100 time, you can target an effort, say 200's at a 1:10 pace, and with :30 rest you could write the workout to fit your individual athletes.

So......need a good set for Thursday?  This is SCM and is about 1:15 in duration.

Warm up:
300 swim
200 kick
200 pull

8 x 75 build up on 1:30
.
Main set
6 x 200 on 2:50
1:10 pace target. (Adjust this send-off on the base time of you or your athlete - you want about :30 rest)

4 x 150 pull on 2:30
Easy / Moderate effort.
.
Cool down
200 easy.

3,900 yards

We here at Podium Training Systems hope you have a wonderful holiday.  Cheers!

Workout Wednesday - 18 December 2013

As most athletes are coming off of their down-time or off-season, it's now up to us as coaches to begin determining what's required for the upcoming pre-season training.  Additionally, as a coach, when you obtain new athletes you need to do your due diligence around their abilities, needs, and limiters so you can properly plan out the necessary remediation.

In the pool, this requires some testing (just as it does for the bike and run) to help determine these limiters, as well as determining their base-100 times for upcoming workouts.  Test sets are a great way to glean massive amounts of information about your athletes abilities and needs.  Not only can you visually obtain information on the stroke and mechanics of your athlete, but the data you get from these sets helps determine if they are aerobic or anaerobic in nature, or if they need speed, speed endurance, or strength endurance.

With new athletes, the test I use most frequently is the 100 / 400 set.  This is a set I came to appreciate from my work with Justin Trolle' over at Vanguard Endurance.  This is a brilliant set for determining a number of metrics from your athlete.  The set is as follows:

Warm up:
200-400 easy swim.
4 x 50 drills
6 x 50 on 1:10. Descending 1-4, 5-8

Main / Test set:
100 @ 90% effort.
:90 seconds rest.
400 @ 100% effort (or as hard as they can go).

At this point, you can include whatever else you might want to have the athlete work on, but they're going to be fatigued.  Be sure to make it lower Z3 efforts, with not too much more volume.  In regards to the warm up - the athlete needs to be sufficiently warm and ready for the main set.  But don't overdo it.

The amount of data you glean from this set is massive.  You get an idea of their repeatable base-100 time (and no, it's not from the 100 time).  You also gain insight into their regression rates.  By that I mean, you have their 100 time - then you're comparing it to their splits in the 400.  This information starts to tell you about their aerobic or anaerobic abilities.

By that I mean: How much does their pace fall off? Does it continue to fall off as the 400 progresses, or is it a static decrease in pace?  What about their stroke rate?  Is their stroke rate increasing as their pace decreases? Or is their stroke rate decreasing as their pace decreases? These all mean different things, and require very different specificity of training to work on the limiters in question.

As your athletes progress, there are other great test sets that can be incorporated into their training to gauge improvements and set new benchmarks:

200m / 800m
3 x 400m
3 x 800m

All of these sets are great.  But they're used for different athletes, training for different race distances, and they yield results that need to be interpreted appropriately.

This is one of the most critical times of year as a coach (and athlete).  Make sure you take the time to do the proper analysis as the season begins so you can prescribe the appropriate training that focuses on the necessary energy systems.

Workout Wednesday - 11 December 2013

For some athletes, the pre-season has begun.  This is where athletes should be looking to have their base-build phase created and they should start working on their limiters and remediating any mechanical issues.  As I've said before, athletes too often neglect speed and speed endurance in their training.  Especially during their base period.  This is a great time to work on speed.


Most athletes that I know can easily swim the distance for an Olympic distance triathlon, or 70.3.  How fast they can swim that distance is the real question.  So today we're looking at another speed endurance / threshold set.  This is one of my favorites (after the set of descending 100's, that is).

I call these "Super 500's", and many of you have most likely seen these before.  As stated below these are done at 95% effort so we again focus on the ability to buffer, clear, and tolerate lactic acid build-up. The main set consists of 2 to 3 of these efforts and, depending on the athlete, three of these 500's will be more than enough.  Chances are, 2 of them will suffice for the majority of athletes.  This written for SCY and should last about 1:15 in duration.

Warm up:
300 easy

200 kick

12 x 50
1-6 on 1:00
7-12 on :50
.
Main set:

2/3 x 500 broken up as:
25-25-50-25-75-50-50-75-25-50-25-25
95% effort. :10 between each effort.
2 min after each 500

8 x 100 on 1:40 (or base + :30)
Descend 1-4, 5-8

Cool down:
200

3100 yards (with 2 x 500)

It's important to note that in any set that is speed-based (whether in the pool, or at the track) it's critical to maintain good form.  If you or your athlete can't maintain good and proper form during high intensity efforts, then the pace needs to come down a little bit until you can.

As always, if you have any questions or would like more information on any sets, please reach out to me and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Triathlon, Diet, and Nutrition

Some time ago, I wrote about a presentation I gave to a triathlon club in Manhattan.  My goal that day was to discuss training, planning, periodization, and nutrition, and to handle any questions as they arose.  

As I said back in my

earlier post

, the volume of questions was nominal during the discussion on proper training methodologies, the differences between speed and speed endurance, etc. But 

what really got everyones attention was my statement that

 “triathlon is not a diet”.

I won't fully recap the previous post - you

can read it

 at your leisure.  The point here is that you need to fuel your body for training, recovery, and performance.  You need to eat carbs.  You need to eat. Period.

I know an individual who, 3 weeks before an Ironman race - his goal race of the year - had cut out carbs in an effort to attain his "ideal racing weight".  

Well, he lost weight. Mostly muscle mass, I'm guessing, as his body had no significant source of glycogen to fuel and recover.  He had a terrible race by his own admission, but he blamed it on other factors. I'm not saying that other factors didn't contribute, but I'm pretty confident that not eating correctly for the final three weeks of training was the primary culprit.

This took place a few years ago.  But that's not so far into the past that smart nutrition didn't exist.

The fact that you should be smart in how you eat is obvious.  But I say "you need to eat" as I hear far too many beginner, and age-group triathletes, talking about losing weight, cutting carbs, and cutting calories, in an attempt to get to their "race weight".

Incorporating a well balanced, whole-food based, nutritionally solid diet during your training is critical. You'll feel better.  You'll recover better.  You'll train better.  You'll most likely race better.  

And it just might make you revisit what your "ideal race weight" is.

Look at what the pro's eat.  They're careful about what they eat, yes, but they eat to train, recover, and race. They consume a large amount of calories to ensure they are providing themselves the fuel and nutrients to train and recover given the volume and intensity of their training.  

Depending on your own activity levels, you will most likely need more than the average amount of calories a day as well.

A well balanced, well thought-out, diet includes proteins, fats, and carbohydrates - always - with the percentages of each macro-nutrient changing throughout the year as you progress from off-season, through your race season.

My education as a coach, as well as my education in sports and performance nutrition, has really opened my eyes to what a proper pre-season, race-season, and off-season, diet can and should look like.  As we're beginning our 2014 season planning, I'm working with my athletes to discuss not only goals and races, but also how diet and nutrition is built into their training.

Are you talking with your coach about nutrition as part of your training?  If not, you should be.